I've been up Wansfell many times in
recent years but always from the Troutbeck side. It's an easy hour,
out on the fells and not so steep that way. I decided to walk most
of the Windermere to Ambleside section of the Windermere Way this
weekend, starting from the station. The walk was pretty much as it
was last time I did it but nice to see the spring flowers
brightening the place up. And the recent rain had brought a flush
of green to the new leaves sprouting everywhere.
When I originally wrote the Windermere Way I remember descending
Wansfell and commenting
"This
path has also been paved for most of it’s length. Care is needed as
some parts have been left rather poorly finished although on the
whole it is quite good."
Not so now.
The people who look after these things have revisited and paved
quite a lot more of the path. Only this time the workmanship is
very much inferior and the new path very difficult to walk on.
This picture shows where a section of
new path adjoins some of the earlier work. The difference can
clearly be seen. How they expect people to walk on this mess is
anyones guess.
Not only that, the stone used has been helicoptered in from some
other part of the Lake District and is totally different from the
natural rock of the Wansfell area which if my memory of the local
geology serves me correctly is part of the Silurian series. The
imported stuff is clearly darker and probably from one of the
quarries in the volcanic rock further north. The
Fix the Fells website
states "Works should be of a high standard of design and
implementation using indigenous materials, sympathetic in colour
and texture to the immediate surrounding area". I'm don't think
they are responsible for this work
Does this matter?
Well I think it does. I've been talking with the planning authority
recently about modifications to a house I'm hoping to buy. I want
to add a dormer into the roof space and replace a rather poorly
constructed kitchen extension. The planners are adamant that local
slate be used for the roofing materials and that the dormer be
constructed in the rear of the roof. Why? To minimise the visual
impact of the changes and to keep the Lake District looking the way
it does now. So why do they allow the hills, surely of far more
significance than the built environment, to be treated in this way.
If Wansfell were a listed building and the owners wanted to repair
it, they would have to consult with English Heritage, use only the
specified materials and if the work is not up to standard, rip it
out and do it all over again. Not only that, the spare stone that
was not required was left
littered over the hillside. A
permanent reminder of the shoddy workmanship employed.
Taking the building analogy a step further, I have also been
talking to the building control department about building regs for
my proposed alterations. If this path had been subject to building
regs., it would have certainly failed.
The upshot of a badly built path is that people will choose not to
use it and this can be clearly seen over much of it's length where
a new and much easier to walk path is being worn alongside.